Collective rationality in bargaining
نویسنده
چکیده
Roth (1977) axiomatized the Nash (1950) bargaining solution without Pareto optimality. His result is considered an improvement on Nash’s original one, since it dispenses with notions of collective rationality. Several variants of Roth’s result have been obtained in a line of subsequent works. However, all of them rely on Nash’s (1950) independence axiom. Whether or how collective rationality can be dispensed with in the absence of independence remained up until the present an unexplored topic, and, in particular, no such foundation have been provided for the Kalai-Smorodinsky (1975) solution—the literature’s central non-independent solution, which, one can informally argue, is second in its status only to that of Nash. In light of this state of affairs, I do the following (i) derive efficiency-free axiomatizations of the Kalai-Smorodinsky solution, and (ii) explore the relationship between Nash’s independence and
منابع مشابه
A characterization of the asymmetric Nash solution
The non-dictatorial asymmetric Nash bargaining solution is characterized on the basis of independence of irrelevant alternatives, independence of equivalent utility representations, and a new axiom—moderate collective rationality. The latter is logically weaker than Roth’s (1977) strong individual rationality and logically stronger than Anbarci and Sun’s (2011) weakest collective rationality.
متن کاملThe Logic of Bargaining
This paper reexamines the game-theoretic bargaining theory from logic and Artificial Intelligence perspectives. We present an axiomatic characterization of the logical solutions to bargaining problems. A bargaining situation is described in propositional logic with numerical representation of bargainers’ preferences. A solution to the n-person bargaining problems is proposed based on the maxmin...
متن کاملAn Ordinal Bargaining Solution with Fixed-Point Property
Shapley’s impossibility result indicates that the two-person bargaining problem has no non-trivial ordinal solution with the traditional game-theoretic bargaining model. Although the result is no longer true for bargaining problems with more than two agents, none of the well known bargaining solutions are ordinal. Searching for meaningful ordinal solutions, especially for the bilateral bargaini...
متن کاملAn Axiomatic Approach of Repeated Interactions
This paper proposes an axiomatic approach to study repeated interaction problems. A solution is a correspondence that maps the set of stage games into the set of infinite sequences of action profiles. Several axioms are presented for a solution: individual rationality, (strong, constrained or weak) collective intelligence, and internal stability. We classify all stage games into families, based...
متن کاملRationality and solutions to nonconvex bargaining problems: Rationalizability and Nash solutions
Conditions α and β are two well-known rationality conditions in the theory of rational choice. This paper examines the implications of weaker versions of these two rationality conditions in the context of solutions to nonconvex bargaining problems. It is shown that, together with the standard axioms of efficiency and strict individual rationality, they imply rationalizability of solutions to no...
متن کامل